[Grabbing an old thread...] Ben Tilly wrote: > My understanding is that the intent of the AL is to keep there from > being a proprietary derivative named perl with restricted source. (If it > is not named perl then that is explicitly allowed.) I believe my draft of the Artistic License does the best it can to reach this goal. I have seen few comments on it, though. Ben, how do you feel about it? Chris? -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- RE: RFC idea David Grove
- RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
- Re: RFC idea Simon Cozens
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
- Re: RFC idea Philip Newton
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
- RE: RFC idea Bradley M. Kuhn
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea David Grove
- RE: RFC idea David Grove
- RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly
- RE: RFC idea Dan Sugalski
- RE: RFC idea David Grove
- RE: RFC idea Chris Nandor
- Re: RFC idea Russ Allbery
- RE: RFC idea Ben Tilly