Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> whispere d: | On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:14:25PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: | > Not in the p5p sense, at least. Regardless of the levels of disapproval, | > generally the disapproval was voiced with at least some courtesy. p5p is | > rather less polite about things. | | I think that's what they call a "false memory". There's been one acrimonious | thread in the past six months or so. Not to mention "revisionist history". There were any number of uncourteous voices during the RFC process. -spp
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Critique available Skud
- Re: Critique available Mike Lacey
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Richard Proctor
- Re: Critique available Skud
- Re: Critique available Steve Fink
- Re: Critique available Phil Olsen