Simon Cozens wrote: > > On the whole, driving a spike between language and internals by giving them > separate lists was not a good idea. Nominally. But how many internals experts actually subscribed to the one and not the other? -- John Porter
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Dave Storrs
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Andy Dougherty
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: Critique available Bart Lateur
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Dan Sugalski
- Re: Critique available Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens