Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, David Grove wrote: > > > Ok, my C's rather rusty, but are we interested in parsing that? > > Yes. I've heard people talk about a C frontend. Will it ever see the > light? I don't know. Does it matter? I don't think so. Sorry, Sam, my strong cynicism (realism ?) is not directed at anyone specifically. The term "little language" has been redefined, and, taking all other posts and goals into consideration, I'm responding to that collective voice. p
- Re: Now, to try again... Sam Tregar
- Re: Now, to try again... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Now, to try again... Sam Tregar
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Sam Tregar
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Now, to try again... Sam Tregar
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Andy Dougherty
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Andy Dougherty
- Re: Now, to try again... David Grove
- Re: Now, to try again... Simon Cozens
- Re: Now, to try again... Steve Fink
- Re: Now, to try again... Simon Cozens
- Re: Now, to try again... Steve Fink
- Re: Now, to try again... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Now, to try again... Dan Sugalski