At 15.32 -0700 01.14.2001, Nathan Torkington wrote: >Chris Nandor writes: >> >(Indeed, it is quite unfortunate that there are so many modules on CPAN >> >that have chosen Artistic-only or GPL-only.) >> >> I think it is unfortunate that anyone would think someone else's choice of >> license is unfortunate. :) > >I can't even remember the topic we're supposed to be discussing, but >I'm pretty sure that this would begin a tangent :-) > >Brad, are we trying to come to a conclusion or is this just babble? Seeing as how the RFC process is done, I don't think there is a conclusion to be had in this forum, at this point. -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
- Re: licensing issues Kai Henningsen
- Re: licensing issues David Grove
- Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Please stay on topic (was Re: lice... Bradley M. Kuhn
- non-licensing issues ? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: l... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (w... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Russ Allbery
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor