Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brad, are we trying to come to a conclusion or is this just babble? My impression of the current discussion is that primarily people are clarifying what RFCs were put in place, and what the impact will be. Some of the discussion has been off-topic, but if people are unclear about why the RFCs were written as they were, then it's worth discussing it. -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn
- Re: licensing issues Dave Rolsky
- Re: licensing issues Russ Allbery
- Please stay on topic (was Re: lice... Bradley M. Kuhn
- non-licensing issues ? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (was Re: l... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-only (w... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Nathan Torkington
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL-onl... Russ Allbery
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to be GPL... Chris Nandor
- Re: no one is asking for Perl to b... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: no one is asking for Perl ... Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Ben Tilly
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues Chris Nandor
- Re: licensing issues Simon Cozens
- Re: licensing issues David Grove