On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:28:00 -0500, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yep, that's another issue, and one I keep forgetting about, though the fact >that we don't do predictable finalization on some objects isn't a good Yes, I know I promised to shut up until you come up with a spec, but there is one thing that irritates me: Could you guys please use "destruction" or "cleanup" as the term for the end-of-scope processing (see e.g. C++). Finalization is used everywhere else to mean: called by GC before the memory is released (see e.g Java/C#). Thanks, -Jan
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... schwern
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Branden
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Dan Sugalski
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Ken Fox
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Robin Berjon
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Dan Sugalski
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ abigail
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ David L. Nicol