On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 15:45 +0000 2001.02.19, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> >> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> >> > >
> >> > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
> >> >
> >> > Same here. Testers?
> >>
> >> perl-builders?
> >
> >Or to be more whimsical:
> >
> > perl-night-shift
> > perl-night-build
> >
> >It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion
> >with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye).
>
> I dunno; I dislike smoking, but I like the idea of "smoking-camels" or
> something. :)
Umm, I recall something from my geography lessons about nomadic tribes
smoking camel dung. I can't remember now if it was on the fire or in
the mouth (yeach). Anyway...
perl-dung
perl-droppings
Umm, maybe not. Er...
perl-smoke-trail (thinking of the night-by-night progress, kind'a)
I dunno. I'm off...
Tim.
