On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name. > > > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders? > > Same here. Testers? perl-builders? -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's daily b... schwern
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl'... Johan Vromans
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion ... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discuss... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Di... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Dis... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org... Chris Nandor
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Alan Burlison
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Mike Lacey
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Di... Vadim Konovalov
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... schwern
- RE: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... Fabio