Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:00:45PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > > So I ask you - *why* make an artificial deadline? What's the point? > > Do you currently believe we're all sufficiently focused on getting the > job done? I ask merely for information. Estimating before specifications are recieved is insane. What was the question? p
- Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...) Adam Turoff
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 36... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC pro... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... David Grove
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 36... Adam Turoff
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC pro... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Adam Turoff
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Edward Peschko