Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >At 05:09 PM 3/23/2001 -0800, Damien Neil wrote: >>So the results of ord are dependent on a global setting for "current >>character set" or some such, not on the encoding of the string that >>is passed to it? > >Nope, ord is dependent on the string it gets, as those strings know what >their encoding is. And the code knows what it wants: if I am in an EBCDIC context then I am going to expect ord to be ones I am used to. This the main pain with 5.7.*'s EBCDIC scheme - making ord('A') == 193 true :-/ > chr is the one dependent on the current default encoding. You are going to see both used in legacy stuff. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Unicode handling Brad Hughes
- Re: Unicode handling Simon Cozens
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dave Mitchell
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel