On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 08:37:05PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >If ord is dependent on the encoding of the string it gets, as Dan > >was saying, than ord($e) is 0x81, > > It it could still be 0x81 (from ebcdic) with the encoding carried > along with the _number_ if we thought that worth the trouble. I'm going to go away and whimper in pain for a bit, now. "I thought chr(0x61) was 'a'." "It is, but that's an EBCDIC number." - Damien
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel