On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > One-liners run on a Perl 6 binary should just be Perl 6 code. Do we > really have to worry about backwards compatibility with one liners? [ . . . ] > Hmm... programs that have perl one-liners inside them might be > troublesome. Yes, precisely. I often have one-liners embedded in larger shell scripts. Most of those survived the perl4->perl5 transition intact. I'd hope the same can be said for the perl5->perl6 transition. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Larry Wall
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Johan Vromans
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi