On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Tim Bunce wrote: [...] > That beautiful code will be beautifully _open_ to _external_ extensions. > And that is how I imagine that Perl 5 support should be implemented. Exactly. I am pretty sure that already at the meeting in Monterey someone suggested that Perl5 should be the first test of the language extension mechanism. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Uri Guttman
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Larry Wall
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: L... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Johan Vromans
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr