On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:36:40PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> I balk at the proposition of Yet Another Namespace.

Where?

> > It also means that every operator has a function name,
> 
> I would think that would be the case, regardless of the
> form the general operator syntax takes.

And functions have attributes, so no new namespace.

-- 
DESPAIR:
    It's Always Darkest Just Before it Gets Pitch Black

                                                    http://www.despair.com

Reply via email to