On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 03:32:56PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
> > Doesn't look like another namespace, but rather an extension of an
> > existing one to me.
> 
> An extension of a namespace?  What's that?
> Either "modifiers" will be symbols in an existing namespace,
> or they will be in their own namespace.

I was rather thinking that we could extend the subroutine namespace to
include the funny symbols and that modifiers would exist there.

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to