Piers Cawley wrote: > Unless > you can get at every single one of those and add a '-M5' switch, then > they aren't going to work. Which could be very bad indeed. The analogous situation with p4->p5 wasn't so bad. People just kept their p4 binaries around for running those old scripts. No biggie. -- John Porter Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David M. Lloyd
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski