John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley wrote: >> Unless you can get at every single one of those and add a '-M5' switch, >> then they aren't going to work. Which could be very bad indeed. > The analogous situation with p4->p5 wasn't so bad. People just kept > their p4 binaries around for running those old scripts. No biggie. There's quite a lot more Perl 5 code out there than there was Perl 4 code. And it's rather annoying to still be maintaining a perl4 installation at this point for the stragglers, although I suppose that can't be helped. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeff Okamoto
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brian Wheeler
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocalyp... Nathan Wiger