Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My vote is to ditch the concat operator altogether. Hey, we have > interpolation! > "$this$is$just$as$ugly$but$it$works" How do you concatenate together a list of variables that's longer than one line without using super-long lines? Going to the shell syntax of: PATH=/some/long:/bunch/of:/stuff PATH="${PATH}:/more/stuff" would really be a shame. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Casey West
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) nick
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol