Simon Cozens wrote: > Let's put it a different way - if we can find a short operator which > is readily accessible on most people's keyboards, then that would > score over a longer operator which is readily accessible on most > people's keyboards. Maybe ~ isn't that operator. Maybe & is, or ^ or > #, or whatever. Or maybe a word operator, in the same family as cmp, eq, ne, le, gt... Perl's stigma for unreadability is bad enough already; now at least we have a good opportunity to unwreak some badness. -- John Porter
- RE: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Tying & Overloading Filipe Brandenburger
- RE: Tying & Overloading Garrett Goebel
- RE: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- RE: Re: Tying & Overloading Brent Dax
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- RE: Tying & Overloading Henrik Tougaard
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading nick
- Re: Tying & Overloading Austin Hastings
- Re: Tying & Overloading Michael G Schwern