Dan Sugalski writes: : That's cool. I was just thinking it might not be a bad idea for us to set=20 : some equivalencies up in advance. If not, that's fine too. (I'll just slip= : =20 : them in while you're not looking... :) Hmm. Harks back to the colonial era: "I claim these brackets in the name of Perl." Hmm. I guess the "We came in peace for all mankind" approach only works when you're quite sure nobody else is gonna claim it for themselves any time soon, which is much truer of the Moon than of Unicode. We hope. Larry
- Apo2: \Q ambiguity Richard Proctor
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Larry Wall
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Larry Wall
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Simon Cozens
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Bart Lateur
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Larry Wall
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Larry Wall
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Johan Vromans
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Michael G Schwern
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Johan Vromans
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity David L. Nicol
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity nick
- RE: Apo2: \Q ambiguity Garrett Goebel
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity not a problem David L. Nicol
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity not a problem Larry Wall
- Re: Apo2: \Q ambiguity is too a problem David L. Nicol