Re: Apoc2 - concerns

[Mark Koopman]

> 
> > I think Uri's qh() suggestion is the cleanest:
> 
> Interesting train of thought, since one of the ideas was that qw() is
> ugly and has to go. (Larry's been saying this for nearly two years now,
> it's just that people sometimes don't listen. :) Let's keep it and add
> something similarly ugly to keep it company!
> 

i use Perl everyday, so from my practical standpoint, i find that qw() helps 
my code to look a lot cleaner and simpler to read 

monty