Re: Apoc2 - concerns

[David L. Nicol]

John Porter wrote:
> 
> Pardon me if someone has already suggested this, but...
> Couldn't labels really be (aliases to) iterator objects?
> So that
>         next FOO
> really *does* mean
>         FOO.next
> 

Marvelous!  That also wraps up the "for should have an explicit
iterator access method" thread handily!  Just label your loop and
there you are!