David Grove writes: : Probably rehashing (no pun intended) a lost cause, but this sounds logical : to me, if you're referring to something similar to PHP's Array['text'] : notation. I.e., : : $array[1] : $hash{'one'} : : becoming : : @group['one'] Currently, @ and [] are a promise that you don't intend to use string indexing on this variable. The optimizer can make good use of this information. For non-tied arrays of compact intrinsic types, this is going to be a major performance win in Perl 6. Larry
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Bart Lateur
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Hillary
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Piers Cawley
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove