Nathan Wiger writes:
: Maybe the name "Perl" should be dropped altogether?

No.  The Schemers had to do a name change because the Lisp name had
pretty much already been ruined by divergence.

: (Granted, that's not what I'd prefer, but the changes are getting 
:  rather massive and are starting to really permute the proposed 
:  language)

If you talk that way, people are going to start believing it.  The
typical Perl 6 program is not going to look very different from the
typical Perl 5 program.  The danger of us continually talking about
the things we want to change is that people will forget to notice the
tremendous amount of stuff that we aren't changing.

Larry

Reply via email to