Nathan Wiger writes: : Maybe the name "Perl" should be dropped altogether? No. The Schemers had to do a name change because the Lisp name had pretty much already been ruined by divergence. : (Granted, that's not what I'd prefer, but the changes are getting : rather massive and are starting to really permute the proposed : language) If you talk that way, people are going to start believing it. The typical Perl 6 program is not going to look very different from the typical Perl 5 program. The danger of us continually talking about the things we want to change is that people will forget to notice the tremendous amount of stuff that we aren't changing. Larry
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Russ Allbery
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- RE: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Damian Conway
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall