On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:55:36AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > If you talk that way, people are going to start believing it. The > typical Perl 6 program is not going to look very different from the > typical Perl 5 program. The danger of us continually talking about > the things we want to change is that people will forget to notice the > tremendous amount of stuff that we aren't changing. It might be useful to draw up a list of functions and features which we don't plan on changing? Maybe just run through each Perl 5 man page and highlight everything that will still be the same and post this somewhere? -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One The desired effect is what you get when you improve your interplanetary funksmanship.
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Russ Allbery
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Wiger
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Damian Conway
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- Re: Perl, the new generation David Goehrig
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens