On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:30:07PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote: > - A while ago, someone suggested that the word 'has' be an alias > for 'is', so that when you roll your own properties, you could write > more-grammatically-correct statements such as "my $var has > Colors(3)". Since 'are' is being considered as a synonym, is there a > possibility that 'has' will make it too? It would be disappointing if a substantial proportion of the built-in keywords were merely syntactic sugar for each other. is|are|has|: seem like far too many ways to express exactly the same concept. -- Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. - Henry Spencer, University of Toronto Unix hack
- Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Edward Peschko
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Simon Cozens
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Dave Storrs
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Simon Cozens
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Dave Storrs
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Mark Koopman
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 John Siracusa
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Simon Cozens
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 John Siracusa
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Simon Cozens
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Russ Allbery
- Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2 Edward Peschko