Re: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2

[John Siracusa]

On 5/15/01 9:07 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
> Interestingly, the code would still have *worked* since the (originally
> unset) property on the node reference would have returned C<undef> which
> would undergo the usual boolean conversion in the C<if>, and the usual
> promotion to zero in the numerical context of the increment.

Ah, Perl... :)

-John