Bryan C. Warnock writes: > I think the biggest fear isn't that Perl is going to grow out of its niche, > but that it's going to outgrow it. It's great that Perl has been able to > expand to be so many things to so many people, but not at the expense of > forgetting its roots - of the whole Right Tool / Right Job that it came > from. In that case, how exactly has it forgotten its roots? I mean, in what way is it not as useful as it was before? Nat
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- RE: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl, the new generation Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl, the new generation Leon Brocard
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski