Re: Perl, the new generation

[Nathan Torkington]

Stephen P. Potter writes:
> Objection, your honor!  This is a logical extention of part of the
> discussion.  If we're discussing what is wrong with perl5 to make perl6
> better differentiating between philosophies is quite on target.

The corner of the discussion about search.cpan.org and broken modules
didn't seem particularly philosophical.

Nat