Simon Cozens wrote: > semantic ambiguity in there if you look hard enough, but > can't come up with any example off hand. I think I don't like the proposition that "it" refer to the most recent *lexically* referenced scalar. For example, in $x ? $y : $z; I think "it" should refer to whichever of $y or $z was evaluated, not always simply $z. How is this done with C<_> currently? -- John Porter
- 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; David L. Nicol
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Simon Cozens
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; John Porter
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Michael G Schwern
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Buddha Buck
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Michael G Schwern
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Simon Cozens
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; John Porter
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; David L. Nicol
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Michael G Schwern
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; John Porter
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; David L. Nicol
- Re: 1 until defined(getvalue()); return it; Michael G Schwern