On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 04:20:12PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> that doesn't address larry's point which is very important. 

No, I was replying to David, so I thought I'd address his point instead.
Conventional, I know. :)

> the regex compiler needs to be able to generate the equvilent of the
> above directly into perl ops.

Yes, of course. It's easy enough to do if, for instance, you have a
Perl op called "exact", "plus", etc. ...

-- 
"Everything's working, try again in half an hour."-chorus.net tech
support

Reply via email to