> I would like to see some sort of "use really_strict" pragma which would > disable at compile time the kinds of things you mentioned: Yes, the point is to make this possible, not required. I thought Perl was supposed to make "hard things possible." This is easy in Java and its not even possible in Perl. > >No subroutine refs. No dynamic inheritance. No autoloading. No > >dynamic method calls. No symbol table manipulation. No eval. No > >automatic method generation. (That's off the top of my head). > > Of those, only subroutine refs and automatic method generation look like > must-haves for major projects, which are willing to surrender some of the > cute stuff in return for stability. Subroutine refs are fine. Again, Java does them with interfaces. Someone please tell me what automatic method generation is exactly. Daniel
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture Garrett Goebel
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture David Whipp
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Simon Cozens
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter