Me wrote: > I don't think it's reasonable to say I propose you change > something that hasn't yet been defined. Rather, it is > precisely because you haven't yet defined the MD array > syntax that I thought it worth at least considering how it > parallels db data BEFORE you define it. Considering how something will be used is often a good idea. What syntax do you propose as being SQL-friendly? This is a sure way to find out if your syntax looks strange for other purposes as well. Daniel
- Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db data Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... schwern
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Sam Tregar
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational d... Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Sam Tregar
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Peter Scott
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Peter Scott
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Simon Cozens
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational d... Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Me
- Re: Multi-dimensional arrays and relational db da... Tim Jenness