At 04:09 PM 8/31/2001 -0500, Me wrote: > > If the dispatcher is drop-in replacable, what does its > > interface look like? > >I'm thinking this is either deep in mop territory, or a probably quite >straightforward set of decisions about dispatch tables, depending >on how you look at things. It'll probably be something like "Here's the function name. Here's the parameters. Do The Right Thing." I don't think there's much need for cleverness on the part of the interface. The actual dispatch code could be nasty, but that's someone else's problem. :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch Hong Zhang
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Damian Conway
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch Damian Conway
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch Hong Zhang
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Michael G Schwern
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch Dan Sugalski
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch Damian Conway
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Me
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Dan Sugalski
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- RE: CLOS multiple dispatch David Whipp
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Dan Sugalski
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch David L. Nicol
- Re: CLOS multiple dispatch Dan Sugalski