At 03:48 PM 9/4/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > DS> Ah. I've always wanted to do that with tied hashes. Okay, even > DS> more reason to pass the data in! (We're going to end up with a > DS> WANT register by the time we're done...) > >that is not a bad idea. we could allocate a PMC register (e.g. #31) >permanently to store WANT info (in a hash i assume like the RFC >implies). I don't think I'd want to soak up a PMC register that way. Maybe an integer one. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Garrett Goebel
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Uri Guttman
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Graham Barr
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Garrett Goebel
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Uri Guttman
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Uri Guttman
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Paolo Molaro
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Paolo Molaro
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Uri Guttman
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Hong Zhang
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Hong Zhang
- RE: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Dan Sugalski
- Re: An overview of the Parrot interpreter Piers Cawley