On Monday 10 September 2001 01:08 pm, Simon Cozens wrote:
> And in addition - why are we worrying about namespace collision RIGHT NOW?
> Sure, when Parrot can be embedded, then we should ensure that our names
> aren't going to clash. But who in their right minds is going to embed
> Parrot in anything in its current state? (Leon, I said "in their right
> minds")
>
> It's not a priority, compared to getting working code out there. We can
> sort it out later.

Oh, how many times have I heard that before?

It's not a prioirty, but it's so much easier to walk the correct path from 
the start.  Since it's all Parrot, it's even easier.

-- 
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to