At 03:01 AM 12/31/2001 -0500, Sam Tregar wrote: >After reading that I'm only left wondering how this concept connects with >continuations. Something tells me that if we implement continuations then >coroutines and generators will fall out nearly for free. On the other >hand, if we don't do continuations then I think this will be quite hard. >Simply put, either we figure out how to package up program state into a >nice package or we don't. Um, I think.
Parrot's doing coroutines and continuations. It's one of the things that's making the sub calling bits a little interesting. (You can do them all with continuations, but those are really overkill for generators, which you'd kinda like to be efficient if at all possible) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk