At 12:02 AM 1/12/2002 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:54:08PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 06:01 PM 1/10/2002 -0500, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> > >Here is a patch that makes pbc2c generated code work with the bsr
> opcode. It
> > >creates a new opcode 'enternative', and uses this to support a mixed
> model of
> > >interpretation and execution of compiled C code.
> >
> > Applied, thanks. Seems to give life about a 25% speedup on my CygWin setup.
>
>As I previously reported the prederef can't cope with the bsr opcode:
>
>
>I don't know how to fix this.
I'm not going to worry too much about it for the moment, as I'm not sure
what the ultimate fate of the prederef stuff will be. If the JIT works out
well on most of our platforms, we may end up removing it.
>[also, I was wondering if there were any other thoughts on my unused variables
>patch, and my vtable_h.pl patch for the index warnings. There are still many
>gcc warnings, but there would be less with these two applied (or reworked)
>[There's no hurry to answer - there's plenty of perl5 for me to be getting
>on with in the meantime :-)]]
I've been holding off for reasons that don't seem to make much sense at the
moment. I'll go apply it.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
