At 6:04 PM +0100 1/22/02, Juergen Boemmels wrote: >Hello, > >some time ago (before I went to holidays) I posted a patch >implementing Schemepairs, but I didn't get any comments about this. I >am wondering what is the reason for this. > >Was the patch too long, or too outdated (I can resend a newer version >of the patch agains current anoncvs).
I had some issues with it, and then it got lost in the shuffle. My fault, and I apologize. >Or is the problem that the patch introduces new core.ops and vtable >entries? I have no idea how to get and set a PMC element the other >way. That was my biggest objection. I like the thought of having a scheme pair data type. The interpreter should see it, and it should be accessed, as a restricted array, one with only two entries. The PMC indexing bits are going to be rejigged in a little while, and when they are I'll post a summary to the list and get some docs in the source kit. -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk