At 4:19 PM +0000 1/24/02, Dave Mitchell wrote: >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That was my biggest objection. I like the thought of having a scheme >> pair data type. The interpreter should see it, and it should be >> accessed, as a restricted array, one with only two entries. > >Is this then the same datatype as a Perl6 pair (cf '=>' op in Apo 3) ??
Good point. it probably is, yes. (Though there may be potential differences--depends on whether the scheme pair can only have scalars on each side, or should allow other things) -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk