On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:30:25AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> method m1
> {
> m2; # calls method m2 in the same class
Yes, but does it call it as an instance method on the current invocant
or as a class method with no invocant? If the former, how would you
do the latter?> .m2; # syntax error Doesn't that violate your stated rule that"the default topic within a method be the invocant? Shouldn't .m2 be equivalent to $_.m2? -- Mark J. REED <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
