At 3:55 PM -0400 4/23/02, Simon Glover wrote: >On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> At 12:25 PM +0200 4/19/02, Peter Gibbs wrote: >> >Mike Lambert wrote: >> >> >This effect is exacerbated by the fact that "set S1, S2" does a >> >string_copy - I am still not sure what is supposed to happen >>here; I believe >> >that the pure set opcode should just be doing a register copy?? There is a >> >clone opcode which also does a string_copy, which seems reasonable. >> >> set S0, S1 is broken. I'm fixing that now. > > And here's a test for that. (By the way, is there any way to test it more > directly?)
Applied, thanks. (And no, not at the moment) -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk