Jeff: > > >Well, it's unhappy when you do lots of things. The code I was given was > > >not as complete/functional as I had been led to believe, inasmuch as it
Eh, I didn't lead you to believe anything, and in fact I think I said it had portability issues. > > Unparsable argument, starting from '"', QUOTE > > No line number, no context, nearly impossible to find to debug. That's an internal error with the assembler, shouldn't happen. It suggests the string regexp is broken. I deliberately didn't add contextual information because I wanted the assembler to be machine-oriented rather than human-oriented, and we can depend on machines to produce well-formed bytecode or it's an internal error on *their* side. > the final PMC issue solutions, at least I hope. It was written back when > keys were going to be a separate set of registers, and we don't do that > any more. I don't think I assumed that keys were going to be a set of registers anywhere, and there's nothing about that in the key PDD or the assembler PDD, or in the original code I have kicking around. I don't understand what you mean here. Maybe one of the PDDs needs updating? -- "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
