On 12 Aug 2002, Simon Cozens wrote: > Here's a more interesting question: which parts of Parrot are enshrined, > and which are prototypes, ready to be thrown away? For instance, I'd > say much of languages/* is all proof-of-concept prototype stuff; imcc > may not be. The assembler I'd call a prototype. The regex engine? The > GC? ... >
The assembler is a bit outdated, it shouldn't be too difficult to bring it up to date, I just don't have enough time latetly. But it did work fine and is easy to extend it. Why do you think it should be thrown away? Daniel Grunblatt.
