At 11:02 PM -0400 8/21/02, 'John Porter' wrote:
>Melvin Smith wrote:
>> Good question. The problem is, there is no one but us to answer
>> that question. Or who are we waiting for?
>
>I'd like to think that Dan would just declare on the matter
>and put it to rest. But what I *really* think is that Larry,
>or at least Damian, might have something very pertinent to say
>about it.
Neither Larry nor Damian have much to say in this regards.
My intention is to get IMCC rolled into the Parrot executable, as the
point between the parser and the interpreter. The intent ultimately
is that you hand an AST, and potentially some rules, to IMCC and it
creates bytecode for you from it. Offline compilers are under no
obligation to use it, but it'll be built into Parrot.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
