Is there a reason you went for a deque instead of a stack? I can definitely see the need for a _PMC_ deque (unshift on the current PerlArray implementation blows), and for an integer _stack_ (regexes), but not for an int-only deque. I'm assuming you have a reason for this, which I have not yet discovered, and I'm curious what it is.
/s On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:48:29PM -0700, Sean O'Rourke wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Steve Fink wrote: > > > I tend to create new PMC classes frequently, and they're a pain to > > > maintain without committing, because you have to touch lots of files > > > to add a PMC, and in ways that are sure to cause conflicts. > > > > Is one of these an intstack PMC, perchance? > > Nope. It used to be. Now it's an integer dequeue, only I'm afraid that > if I called it that nobody would use it. :-) > > It will be going in Real Soon Now. (It's been finished and heavily > tested for quite some time, but I've had to sneak in a bunch of > precursor patches to prepare things for it.) >
