On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:54:18PM -0800, Dave Whipp wrote: > "Michael Lazzaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After thinking about it a little more, I'll set myself on the "yes" > > side. And propose either '===' or ':=:' to do it. > > Definitely '==='. Hopefully, this thread has been settled by Damian's pointing out the existence of id(), but could I put in a strong vote against the use of '===' for anything? It is far too easy to misread as ==, IMHO. --Dks
