--- Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mr. Nobody wrote: > > --- Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Mr. Nobody wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Unicode operators in the core are a very, very, very, very, very, very, > >> > >>very, > >> > >>>very, very, very, very, very, very bad idea. > >> > >>We've already had this discussion. We wouldn't be bringing up using > >>unicode operators for this function if we hadn't already talked about > >>unicode operators for other things -- like vector ops. > > > > > > So if we already talked about why they're such a terrible idea, why are > > people still proposing them for other things? > > Because we decided to use them, at least for vector-ops. > > Take a look at > <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=3DD9BBC5.9090209%40conway.org> > > for one of the last messages I could find about vector-op syntax.
Is it too late to contest that? I guess if there's going to be unicode operators no matter what, it wouldn't hurt to have a few more :| __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
