On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:53:26PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > blair christensen wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 02:09:10PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > >>Rather badly, actually. All the tests that involve parrot currently > >>segfault in the NCI mark routine. At least on OS X, I'm not sure > >>about other platforms. > > >(gdb) bt > >#0 0x1a8638 in pobject_lives () > >#1 0x1bcc78 in Parrot_NCI_mark () > > > Is this with my patch (in CVS) already applied?
Yes. I just did a realclean, cvs up, configure, make, and make test. Lots of core files and as the last tinderbox report for this box shows [0], a lot of failed tests. Parrot has never been completely happy on this box but it seems to have taken a turn for the worse. blair. [0] <http://tinderbox.perl.org/tinderbox/showlog.cgi?log=parrot/1043172962.94137.gz&fulltext=1>
